“There is No Such Thing as Natural Immunity; There is Survivor Immunity.”
The article argues against the phrase “natural immunity,” calling it misleading and proposing a sharper alternative: “survivor immunity.” It critiques the idea that immunity is a fixed, guaranteed property of nature and rather emphasizes that immune protection comes from individual survival experiences, exposures, and responses. The piece suggests that naming matters because it shapes how people understand risk and policy. Professor Christopher Halkides is credited with offering the clearer term, urging readers to focus on the personal and contextual nature of immune protection rather than an inherent “natural” status. If you’re curious about how wording can influence public thinking on immunity, this piece is a quick, provocative read.
